The CTA Mistake Killing Sales

Hey there Smarty 👋

Are you geared up to catch the latest and greatest in quick shorts?

And just a quick heads-up! If you stumbled upon us through a friend, make sure to subscribe here! That way, you’ll never miss out on the trending shorts.

🎯 Scroll-Depth CTAs vs. Static Placement: The Conversion Debate Nobody’s Having

Most brands treat CTAs like furniture, fixed in place and assumed to work. But the way users scroll, stop, and decide reveals a hidden layer of CTA behavior that’s either costing you sales or compounding your conversion rate.

Scroll-depth CTAs (like sticky add-to-cart buttons) follow the user, adapting to their intent and scroll velocity. Static CTAs, on the other hand, anchor to fixed zones, often above the fold or at the end of the PDP. Both seem harmless until you understand what buyers do on the page.

1. Why Static CTAs Often Fail to Catch the Buyer at the Right Moment

Most DTC brands over-index on hero-section CTAs,  assuming purchase intent is instant. But here’s what happens:

• Buyers skim the top of the page, but make decisions deeper in the funnel.
• The CTA that converts isn’t the first one seen — it’s the one seen when the user is ready.
• Without scroll-depth logic, most brands miss this moment entirely.

Static CTAs are easy to design but brutal in performance if your product requires education. Skincare, wellness, fitness, and supplement brands suffer most here — where the bulk of persuasion happens mid-scroll, not upfront.

2. The Scroll-Depth Advantage: Catching the ‘Warm Decision’ in Real-Time

Scroll-depth CTAs work because they reduce the gap between intent and action. They don’t ask the buyer to scroll back up or hunt down the button.

• They travel with the buyer, silently reinforcing action as they get more convinced.
• They respect buyer pace, not forcing action, just being present.
• They’re also great for capturing “hover-hesitation” behavior, where buyers stall but don’t bounce.

A/B tests show scroll-depth CTAs outperform static ones by up to 26–38% on mobile when paired with longer-form PDPs. This isn’t about UX flashiness, it’s behavioral alignment.

3. Where Brands Get It Wrong with Sticky CTAs

Sticky CTAs fail when they:

• Overwhelm the content (e.g., massive buttons, high opacity)
• Ignore the natural pause points (like after reviews or ingredient deep-dives)
• Clash with mobile UI patterns, hiding filters or product images

The best implementations often delay stickiness until scroll threshold is met (e.g., 25% scroll or more), letting the PDP breathe before prompting. You’re not trying to “trap” the user, you’re trying to stay convenient.

4. Strategic CTA Mapping: A Better Way to Think About Placement

Think of CTA behavior like ad frequency:

• Too early = banner blindness
• Too late = missed opportunity
• Right moment = micro-conversion

The smartest brands map CTA visibility to scroll depth + cognitive state:

• Above the fold for urgency buyers
• Mid-scroll for consideration-stage readers
• End of page for validators (price checkers, review scanners)

This doesn’t mean having 3 buttons, it means using one CTA intelligently.

Why It Matters

In a world where mobile bounce happens in under 8 seconds and 70% of purchases come mid-scroll, CTA behavior isn’t a design choice,  it’s a revenue lever. Scroll-depth CTAs meet intent in motion. Static ones hope the buyer scrolls back.

The real question isn’t “where should the CTA be?”

It’s: “At what moment is your buyer actually ready to act,  and are you there when they are?”

Together with Eko

Your product gallery holds the answers.

Most brands just aren't looking there.

Marketers spend hours optimizing ads and landing pages, but the real decision-making happens on your PDP. That's where shoppers compare and decide what to buy.

This guide from Eko breaks down what most brands overlook: 

How product gallery engagement data can reveal what's working, what's missing, and what's slowing customers down.

See how brands like Mockingbird and Andie Swim improved conversion with simple changes.

You’ll learn how to identify high-intent signals inside your gallery. 

Get this playbook to build product pages that convert with more clarity and confidence.

Download the free guide from Eko and start using the data already on your site!

🧠 Gemini Outperforms Other AIs on PPC Accuracy

AI is now deeply embedded in PPC strategy, but not all models are created equal. A new test shows that while some tools deliver helpful insights, others pose serious risks to your ad performance. One clear winner? Google Gemini with the lowest error rate and the most platform-specific accuracy.

The Breakdown:

1. One in five PPC answers from AI tools are wrong - Wordstream tested 45 PPC-related prompts across 5 major AI tools. On average, 20% of responses were inaccurate, posing real risks to campaigns and budgets. Google AI Overviews had the highest error rate (26%), while Gemini was lowest at just 6%.

2. Gemini leads with up-to-date, benchmark-aligned responses - Gemini consistently offered the most precise, current PPC insights, especially on bidding strategies, quality scores, and CPC logic. It was also the only tool to suggest niche, cost-effective keywords when asked. 

3. Other tools showed platform bias or evasion - Meta AI often framed answers from a Facebook Ads lens, even for Google queries. ChatGPT leaned overly positive, avoiding critical feedback, and was the only tool to promote itself. 

AI is changing PPC workflows, but not all tools deserve blind trust. With error rates this high, advertisers must verify output, tailor prompts, and use platform-native models like Gemini to avoid costly missteps. Smart AI usage starts with smart AI selection.

🚀Quick Hits

📉 Your best-sellers shouldn’t be stuck in transit. Portless cuts delivery from 60 days to 6, so you can sell products days after manufacturing, not months later. Plus, defer tariffs until the sale hits. Contact Portless and get started today!

🖼️ Google’s Flow AI now animates still images, letting users add speech to photos via Frames to Video.

🧠 OpenAI is launching an AI browser built on Chromium to rival Google. With 1B+ daily queries, it may keep users inside ChatGPT, reshaping search, ads, and publisher traffic forever.

🚀 Grok 4 just launched and shattered benchmarks, xAI claims it’s the world’s most powerful AI, powered by 200K Nvidia H100s. It beat ARC-AGI and “Humanity’s Last Exam,” impressing even Elon.

🇺🇸 TikTok denies it’s building a separate US-only app, but the denial is vague and leaves room for interpretation. The rumored “M2” version with a different algorithm might still exist.

That’s a wrap for today! Tell us your thoughts about today's content as we line up more Shorts! And don’t hesitate to share this with someone who’d adore it. 🥰